![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
| Preventing HIV |
| Treating HIV |
| Living with HIV |
| For service providers |
| For health care providers |
| Access our services |
| Find organizations |
| News and events |
| About CATIE |
| Site map |
| Home |
| CATIE Ordering Centre |
CATIE-News: Bite-sized HIV/AIDS news bulletinsCell stimulant touted as yet another cure—proceed with cautionSince the beginning of the AIDS pandemic, scientists have been testing a wide variety of compounds in the hope of eradicating or curing HIV infection. Sadly, so far none have worked. The latest compound to garner some potential role in helping the immune system is vitamin D–binding protein (DBP). Over the past four decades DBP has undergone a few name changes as researchers have found new roles for it. When it was first discovered, DBP was called Gc because it was part of a larger group, or complex, of proteins. Later, researchers found it could help move vitamin D around the body, and it was called DBP. Most recently, scientists in Japan have been conducting experiments that suggest that DBP, when slightly modified by enzymes, can have stimulating effects on a group of immune cells called macrophages. Because DBP has stimulating effects on macrophages, it is sometimes called macrophage-activating factor. More about these cellsMacrophages are an important part of the immune system and have many functions, including the following:
Made in…Although the liver seems to make most of the body’s DBP, many other tissues also make this protein, and DBP has been found in the following:
DBP has also been found on the surface of many cells of the immune system as well as on sperm and muscle cells. What does it do?The full extent of DBP’s role in the body is not clear, but it appears to do more than help transport vitamin D. Perhaps the most interesting aspect of DBP’s properties is its effect on the immune system, where it appears to help regulate the response to infection. Here is one theory of how DBP might work, based on the results of animal experiments: When an infection occurs, the subsequent inflammation attracts B- and T-cells. These cells release enzymes that convert DBP into macrophage-activating factor (MAF). This compound helps macrophages fight infections. Then, almost magically, after the infection has been brought under control, MAF is supposed to help shut down an unneeded immune response. How this compound can change from an immune stimulant to an immune suppressant has not been clearly explained by proponents of MAF-based therapy. Bear in mind that this is all theory and not well understood, perhaps even by its proponents. Based on results of experiments on cells and animals in the lab, Japanese researchers decided to study the potential role of MAF in HIV/AIDS. According to their findings, an enzyme that they have named nagalase (correct name: alpha-N-acetylgalactosaminidase) found in the blood of HIV positive people seems to inactivate MAF. Apparently nagalase is released by HIV-infected cells and seems to be found on HIV itself. MAFThe research team has supposedly found a way of converting DBP to MAF in the lab. The team claims that in pilot studies of HIV negative people with cancer who had MAF injected into muscle once weekly for several months, the cancers were apparently cured. Because macrophage dysfunction is an effect of HIV infection, the researchers expected that MAF would fix this problem and cure HIV infection. Their work, which we now assess, will be published in the January 2009 issue of the Journal of Medical Virology. Study detailsThe team recruited 15 HIV positive people who were free of AIDS-related symptoms and who did not have anemia. They injected participants with 100 nanograms of MAF once weekly into muscle, for between six and 18 weeks. ResultsThe team presented a few details on only five participants. In these five people, viral loads fell to low or so-called undetectable levels over the course of the first six weeks of the study. Bear in mind that the viral load assay used in the study had a lower-limit of quantification of 400 copies/mL. More sensitive assays with a lower-limit of quantification ranging between 75 and 40 copies/mL are routinely used in high-income countries such as Japan. That the MAF research team used an older and less-sensitive assay is unusual and suggests that its pilot study was done many years ago when high-sensitivity viral load assays were not yet available. As a result of using the 400-copy assay, it is possible that low-level viral replication that the assay could not detect was taking place in study participants. In the remaining 10 participants, results of CD4+ assessments suggested that levels of these cells generally doubled after therapy with MAF and levels of CD8+ cells fell. The researchers claim that these high CD4+ counts were maintained for seven years after MAF therapy ended. There were no apparent side effects from exposure to MAF. Caution and concerns
—Sean R. Hosein REFERENCES:
| |
|
Created on: 12/15/2008 |
|
| |
|
Decisions about particular medical treatments should always be made in consultation with a qualified medical practitioner who is knowledgeable about HIV-related illness and the treatments in question. MORE | |